Newer Post | Older Post

I apologize if ...
by Ted Slater on Sep 5, 2006 at 8:41 AM

I heard it again yesterday: The Non-Apology.

I call it a "non-apology" because it's conditional, and places the responsibility on the sinned-against rather than the sinner. "I'm sorry if you were offended by that," they say. "I'm sorry if you misunderstood me."

But the non-apology misses out on the power of a real apology. A real apology brings about forgiveness and growth and reconciliation, while the non-apology merely glosses over the sin.

A real apology accepts full responsibility, doesn't escape responsibility by giving "reasons" for the misbehavior, is specific, and is not conditional. An example: "I apologize that I snapped at you. It was wrong for me to disrespect you that way and I'll try my best not to do that again. Please forgive me."

Now that's an apology I'd like to hear more often.

Comments

Post a comment*

*Comments are moderated, and will not appear on The Line until we've approved them. Usually you'll see your comment published in under an hour, but it may take up to a day or so during evenings or over the weekend. While we are eager to facilitate civil conversation by publishing most comments, we're inclined not to publish those that strike us as offensive, vulgar, overly personal, cynical, snarky, deceptive, disrespectful, irrelevant, redundant or unnecessarily contentious.

External Links

Note: Links to external sites do not constitute blanket endorsement or complete agreement by Boundless or Focus on the Family with information or resources offered at or through those sites.

GOOGLE THIS BLOG

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS FEEDS







The Boundless Show
Stay Connected


Copyright 2008 Focus on the Family. All rights reserved. International copyright secured. The Line and Boundless Line are trademarks of Focus on the Family.